How the Media Frame Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Tanf
Abstract
Temporary Aid for Needy Families (TANF) has limited success in building cocky-sufficiency, and rarely addresses exposure to trauma as a barrier to employment. The objective of the Edifice Wealth and Wellness Network randomized controlled trial was to test effectiveness of fiscal empowerment combined with trauma-informed peer support against standard TANF programming. Through the method of single-blind randomization we assigned 103 caregivers of children under age six into three groups: control (standard TANF programming), fractional (28-weeks fiscal teaching), and full (same equally partial with simultaneous 28-weeks of trauma-informed peer support). Participants completed baseline and follow-up surveys every 3 months over 15 months. Grouping response rates were equivalent throughout. With mixed effects analysis nosotros compared postal service-program outcomes at months 9, 12, and 15 to baseline. We modeled the impact of corporeality of participation in group classes on participant outcomes. Despite high exposure to trauma and arduousness results demonstrate that, compared to the other groups, caregivers in the full intervention reported improved self-efficacy and depressive symptoms, and reduced economic hardship. Unlike the intervention groups, the control group reported increased developmental risk among their children. Although the command group showed higher levels of employment, the full intervention group reported greater earnings. The partial intervention grouping showed picayune to no differences compared with the control group. We conclude that financial empowerment education with trauma-informed peer support is more than effective than standard TANF programming at improving behavioral health, reducing hardship, and increasing income. Policymakers may consider adapting TANF to include trauma-informed programming.
Introduction
The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF) is meant to aid low income caregivers gain employment skills, secure employment and attain cocky-sufficiency. Yet, afterwards xx years of research on the impacts of TANF, it is articulate that information technology falls short of helping people enter the workforce and stay there, and that TANF participants have serious behavioral health challenges that affect their ability to reach cocky-sufficiency (Bryner and Martin 2005; Dworsky and Courtney 2007; Martin and Caminada 2011). In club to receive TANF, caregivers with young children under age vi are required to participate in xx "work hours" per week that may include job search, training, or other programming. However, evidence shows that the majority of such programs practice non address the well-being of families, nor are in that location incentives to help caregivers discover steady well-paying opportunities (Corcoran et al. 2004; Danziger 2010; Hildebrandt and Stevens 2009; Kaplan et al. 2005). In many instances, TANF participants may become jobs, but exercise not succeed in keeping them, only to return to TANF again (Hildebrandt and Kelber 2012; Hildebrandt and Stevens 2009; Ziliak 2014).
Virtually ane third of TANF recipients have a work-limiting wellness status, and high rates of exposure to violence and arduousness in their families and communities (Cheng 2013; Kennedy 2006; Lown et al. 2006). Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) consisting of concrete and emotional abuse and neglect, sexual abuse, and household dysfunction, such equally having a household member in prison or witnessing domestic violence, are specially prevalent among those receiving TANF (Cambron et al. 2014). The original ACEs studies were conducted at Kaiser Permanente in Southern California in two waves of data drove of over 17,000 members of their Health Maintenance Organization, where adverse childhood experiences reported past survey respondents were compared with current health status and behaviors (Anda et al. 2006; Felitti et al. 1998). Since then additional inquiry studies accept linked ACEs to work-limiting atmospheric condition such as depression, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases, and nutrient insecurity, while damaging work prospects and stable income (Adams et al. 2013; Anda et al. 2008; Breiding et al. 2014; Cambron et al. 2015; Chilton et al. 2015; Danese et al. 2009; Dube et al. 2009; Staggs et al. 2007). High exposure to adversity amongst TANF-eligible caregivers as well has crippling effects for academic accomplishment, parenting, employment, and executive functioning capabilities (Evans et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2013; Lu et al. 2008; Randles 2014). Every bit an antidote, edifice upwardly social support and promoting resilience take been shown to assistance interrupt the cycle of adversity (Kneipp et al. 2011; Larkin et al. 2014; Vayshenker et al. 2016). In addition, trauma-informed approaches that integrate noesis and sensation of how trauma affects cerebral, social and emotional functioning, that seek to ensure that operations and processes practice not re-traumatize individuals and incorporate grouping therapy approaches, have shown promise for reducing depression and other trauma-related symptoms (Bethell et al. 2014; Staub and Vollhardt 2008). Based on this research, it is clear that trauma-informed approaches may benefit TANF programming that seeks to improve employment and self-sufficiency outcomes for low income caregivers, many of whom have experienced agin childhood experiences, intimate partner violence and community violence.
Despite the growing evidence that ACEs and community violence are prevalent amidst low income caregivers (Anda et al. 2006; Baglivio et al. 2014; Dreier et al. 2001; Peterson and Krivo 2005), TANF is one of the public assistance programs that has seen many attempts to improve outcomes without attention to this growing scientific base. Numerous randomized controlled trials take sought to improve employment outcomes, and these interventions have met with varied success (Falk 2012; Gueron and Rolston 2013). The bulk of these big trials have integrated approaches that work with each client on an private footing to connect them with employment and/or education, and to reduce participation in TANF (Gueron and Rolston 2013). Other TANF RCT's take sought to address health barriers through referrals and home visits (Kneipp et al. 2011, 2013). To appointment, however, there has been no intervention that has sought to integrate trauma-informed do and programming into TANF programming for caregivers who are required to carry out work participation in order to receive benefits. In addition, in that location is growing interest in how public assistance programs touch on both caregiver and kid. Recognizing that childhood experiences shape adult behavior, health and income, and, in turn, that caregivers' health and success shape the health and wellbeing of their young children, government agencies have begun to adopt a two-generation framework that integrates some attention to child wellness (Chase-Lansdale and Brooks-Gunn 2014; Role of Family unit Assistance PeerTA Network 2015; Shonkoff and Fisher 2013).
This randomized controlled trial, The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network RCT), sought to reduce economic hardship and behavioral health challenges associated with self-sufficiency amid families with at least i kid under age half dozen who were required to fulfill 20 h of piece of work participation each week. The assay examines the touch on of The Network RCT 28-week curriculum on behavioral health outcomes, economic hardship, and labor force participation among TANF participants by investigating three questions. Our first aim was to identify if there was selection bias in follow up response rates that could lead to erroneous differences in outcome measurements unrelated to handling assignment. Secondly, we hypothesized that compared to the control group, intervention participants would experience statistically significant improvements in behavioral health, economical hardship, and labor market outcomes afterward exposure to the intervention. Thirdly, we hypothesized that compared to those that had low participation in the intervention, those that had greater exposure to the interventions would report improvements in health, hardship, and employment.
Method
Participants
Participants were primary caregivers of immature children under the age of six who were receiving temporary assistance for needy families and who are required to work at least 20 h per week in social club to receive these benefits. Recruited by enquiry staff at three county assistance offices, the 103 participants were randomized into three groups: 31 in the control group, 35 in the partial intervention, and 37 in the full intervention (Table 1). While bones characteristics have already been reported in a previous publication (Sun et al. 2016), we highlight across all groups high rates of depressive symptoms ranging from 49 to 62%, and at least i business organisation of child developmental risk ranging from 12.9 to 22.9%, and over half of the participants reporting moderate to astringent food, housing, or utility hardship. Additionally, over 90% of the sample was unemployed at baseline.
Procedure
Through single-blind randomization participants were assigned into each group. After consenting to participate, participants completed baseline and follow-up surveys every 3 months over 15 months and received additional resources and the opportunity to speak with a social worker if needed. Nosotros conducted a mixed effects analysis to compare baseline to postal service-programme outcomes at months 9, 12, and 15. In a dissever assay, nosotros included class participation as a control to model bear on of class participation on outcomes for the partial and full groups. While this does not necessarily indicate adherence (Fixsen et al. 2005), class participation is an indication of amount of exposure to the group process so essential to learning about finances, sharing resource, and having opportunities to build cocky-efficacy. Recruitment and randomization processes were successful, every bit there were no statistically significant differences in all characteristics and baseline outcomes by group. Baseline outcomes from our sample testify high rates of exposure to ACEs and customs violence. Most forty% of all caregivers reported experiences of iv or more adversities in their childhood, including abuse, neglect and household dysfunction; 64.7% of caregivers had seen a seriously wounded person subsequently an incident of violence, and 27.ii% had seen someone killed. Caregivers reported on the wellness and wellbeing of their children at baseline, and 36% reported their young children to exist at risk for cognitive, social, and emotional delay, and nearly half (48.v%) of their fathers spent time in prison house. A full clarification of methods and baseline characteristics are outlined in a previous publication (Sun et al. 2016). The Network RCT ran from June 2014 to December 2015; Clinical trial registration number NCT02577705.
Nosotros used Audio Figurer-Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI) software to administer all surveys regarding demographics, economic hardship, behavioral health, exposure to adversity and violence, and labor market outcomes. The research staff included measures validated past the clinical literature within the survey to ensure the external validity of the findings and tested glitches and readability with multiple respondents who are similar to those in the study. On average, the baseline survey took about lx min to complete; each follow-upward survey took approximately 30 min. Each participant was compensated $25 dollars for participating in each survey. With 6 full surveys, participants had the opportunity to receive up to $150. Responses for follow-up questionnaires in months 3 and 6 were excluded from the report sample, equally they were administered earlier the cease of the 28-week curriculum.
The Network RCT included 3 groups: control, a partial intervention and full intervention. The command grouping received standard TANF programming consisting of 20 h per week of scheduled supervised task training and job search activities. The partial intervention group received assistance in opening a credit marriage savings account, into which their own savings were matched by The Network RCT. It also included 28-weeks of financial empowerment education in weekly 3-hr classes. Content focused on identifying and harnessing internal and external resources to take steps towards self-sufficiency with educational activity that included basic concepts of saving for teaching, housing, entrepreneurial activities, and retirement, and improving credit and reducing debt. The total intervention group received the same financial empowerment education and matched savings accounts as the partial group, with an added 28-week four-hr peer support group chosen Cocky-Empowerment Groups. The grouping proper name drew from the Sanctuary Model®, a trauma-informed approach to social services (Flower and Sreedhar 2008). The curriculum drew on key components from the model'due south Due south.E.L.F. framework by focusing on four domains: creating physical, psychological, social and moral safety (S), processing and managing emotions (East), recognizing loss and letting get (50), and developing goals for a sense of future (F). The language of S.E.50.F. establishes a mutual framework that helps people who have experienced arduousness to work towards building a stable foundation that supports their relationships with each other, inside their families and communities, and gives opportunities for people to limited their goals and potential for success. Financial empowerment classes were led past a facilitator contracted through a local financial services system. S.E.L.F. groups were led by two trained peer group facilitators.
Measures
This report examines measures of family behavioral health (depression, cocky-efficacy, and child developmental risk), economic hardship (hardship alphabetize), and labor market outcomes (employment status, earnings).
Depressive symptoms were measured using the validated ten-item Middle for Epidemiologic Studies Low Calibration (CES-D)(Kohout et al. 1993; Radloff 1977). Which is reliable and consistent with the original version across a wide variety of populations (Hann et al. 1999; Zhang et al. 2012). Each item measures depressive symptoms on a 3-bespeak calibration (30 points full). College scores reflect greater depressive symptoms; a score of 10 or more is an indication of clinical depression.
Ability to manage stress, and capacity to address challenges is measured using the 10-detail General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) which has strong validity and reliability beyond numerous populations including low income caregivers (Scholz et al. 2002; Schwarzer and Jerusalem 1995). Each item represents a measurement of an individual's ability to deal with different demanding situations on a 4-point scale (38 points total); higher scores reflect a participant'due south greater ability to deal with demanding situations.
Child'southward developmental risks were measured using the 10-item Parent'due south Evaluation of Developmental Condition Calibration (PEDS) (Glascoe 1998b). Each detail measures developmental risk on a 3-point scale; but affirmative responses to developmental gamble questions based on child's historic period are tallied (10 points total). These data are used to construct a developmental gamble indicator, equal to ane if one or more developmental risks are reported, and 0 otherwise. PEDS has been validated with many disadvantaged US populations, and has a sensitivity of 91–97% and specificity of 73–86% (Glascoe 1998c). 1 or more developmental risks reported past the parent, are associated with significant inability in developed life (Glascoe 1998a, 2003; Glascoe and Marks 2011).
Nosotros measured economic hardship with an index that aggregates responses from iii validated measures: the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM), an energy security survey, and housing security survey. Each construct generates three mutually sectional categories to capture levels of material hardship in the previous 3 months. The HFSSM is a validated eighteen-item scale developed by U.S. Department of Agriculture to measure out household food insecurity, meaning the lack of admission to enough nutrient for an active and healthy life for the household and/or children (Bickel et al. 2000), which as excellent reliability ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 (Carlson et al. 1999). Households were coded as nutrient secure, low food secure, very low food secure. Considering food insecurity is related to other forms of hardship, we combined food insecurity with free energy and housing insecurity based on previous research (Frank et al. 2010). Free energy insecurity was coded equally free energy secure (no threatened or actual utility disconnections, no unheated/uncooled days, and no apply of a cooking stove for heating), moderate energy insecurity (threatened utility disconnection because of nonpayment), or severe energy insecurity (unheated or uncooled mean solar day because of nonpayment, bodily utility disconnection, and/or heating the residence with a cooking stove). Housing insecurity was categorized as housing secure (≤one movement in previous year and not crowded or doubled upward), moderate housing insecurity (household is crowded and/or doubled up and has ≤one move), or severe housing insecurity (household is crowded and/or doubled upwards and has moved ≥2 times). Crowding was defined as >2 people per chamber and doubling up every bit a positive reply to the post-obit question, adapted from the U.s.a. Demography: "Are you temporarily living with other people even for a petty while because of economic difficulties?" (Cutts et al. 2011). Cumulative hardship alphabetize scores ranged from 0 to 6, with food, housing, and energy each contributing a possible score of 0 (secure), 1 (moderately insecure), or 2 (severely insecure) to generate scores indicating no hardship (score of 0 = 0), moderate hardship (scores of 1–iii = 1), or severe hardship (scores of 4–6 = ii).
Labor market outcomes include self-reported electric current employment status and hourly earnings. In regression assay, hourly earnings are transformed into logs to address skewness.
Information Analyses
Descriptive statistics summarize respondent characteristics and outcomes across intervention groups at baseline and identify that across all follow-upward periods there were equivalent response rates. We analyzed differences in response profiles between treatment groups using multivariate linear mixed furnishings modeling, with participant every bit a random effect and time of assessment (baseline and ix, 12, and xv months) and treatment grouping indicators (command, partial, full) equally fixed effects. Other control variables in the model include gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, exposure to arduousness and violence, and the interaction between time of assessment and form completion. In a separate analysis of the partial and full intervention participants only, we included grade omnipresence to measure effects of class participation on participant outcomes. Least squares means were calculated using the mixed effects analysis and differences are reported across fourth dimension and groups.
We chose mixed effects models over generalized linear models (GLM) or generalized estimating equation models (GEE) not only for their ability to control for the fixed furnishings that influence these changes in outcomes, merely also for their ability to model correlation betwixt measurements of the same participant through the inclusion of a random event (Gardiner et al. 2009). Further, GLM has the force of generating consistent estimates of regression parameters in the presence of data missing at random and non-ignorable missing information, which avoids the need to utilize consummate case data to generate consistent coefficient estimates (Ibrahim et al. 2005). Every bit per convention for studies with pocket-size sample size, p-value < 0.10 was considered to betoken significant differences between subgroups.
Results
Aside from caregiver age, where the partial intervention grouping was slightly younger than the other groups (p = 0.07), there were no statistically pregnant differences in participant demographics observed, suggesting successful randomization. We display response rates and basic characteristics of the study sample in Tabular array 2 for survey participation from baseline and follow-up months 9, 12, and 15. Response rates were fifty% at calendar month 9 (n = 52), 50% at month 12 (northward = 53), and 45% at month 15 (n = 46). Nosotros conducted a rank test of the independence of response rates beyond groups by follow-upwardly months, and found no pregnant differences in the distribution of handling consignment over fourth dimension (p = 0.9253).
Behavioral health, hardship, and labor market place outcomes are displayed in Table three. Participants in the total intervention experienced statistically significant declines in depressive symptoms by month 15 compared to baseline (−1.13 points; p = 0.0640) and this pass up is significantly lower compared to the control group at month 15 (p = 0.0154). Neither participants in the command group nor the partial intervention experienced whatsoever statistically pregnant changes in depressive symptoms. Compared to the baseline, the full intervention experienced an increase in cocky-efficacy at calendar month 9 (1.08 points; p = 0.0388). During the same fourth dimension catamenia, the control group experienced a statistically significant decline in cocky-efficacy at month 9 (−2.84 points; p = 0.0589). Neither participants in the partial or full intervention experienced statistically significant changes in child developmental risks. Yet, among the control group, compared to the baseline, at that place was a statistically significant increase in the probability of reporting child evolution risks at month 9 (21%; p = 0.0680).
Compared to baseline, participants in the total intervention experienced statistically significant declines in economic hardship by month 12 (−0.73 points, p = 0.0640). Neither the control nor partial intervention reported statistically significant changes in hardship throughout the written report menses.
The command group experienced statistically meaning increases in employment in every follow-up period. In particular, employment increased by 26 percent (p = 0.0384) past month 15. Neither the partial nor full intervention reported significant changes in employment over the study menstruum. Still, compared to baseline, the full intervention experienced a statistically significant increase in earnings by month 12 (p = 0.0857), while the control and partial intervention groups reported no significant changes in hourly earnings.
The average class attendance for the partial and total intervention at the end of the 28-week pedagogy program was 26.0 and 23.6%, respectively (Tabular array four). This leads to an important question of whether increasing exposure to either intervention program could atomic number 82 to increased positive impact on participant outcomes. Increased grade participation was not associated with statistically significant changes in adult depressive symptoms, child evolution take a chance, self-efficacy, economic hardship, employment, or earnings for the partial intervention group. Still, increased class attendance was associated with statistically meaning improvements in some outcomes for the full intervention. In particular, the mixed effects coefficient estimates for class participation presented in Tabular array iv demonstrate that increasing class attendance by i pct was associated with decreases in developmental risks for the participant'south youngest child (coefficient estimate: −0.0048, p = 0.0284), non-meaning increases in cocky-efficacy (coefficient estimate: 0.0463, p = 0.1048), and increased probability of employment (coefficient guess: 0.0048, p = 0.0443).
Discussion
Results demonstrate that the randomization was effective. Our survey response rate ranged from 45–50%, which is college than average for at take chances depression-income caregivers (Western et al. 2016). In that location were no meaning differences by grouping in terms of baseline and follow-upwardly characteristics and survey response charge per unit. This suggests that the results, where groups are compared both within and across groups, are likely due to the intervention itself.
The Network RCT intervention demonstrated important and diverse findings. Changes in health, economic hardship and employment varied at each follow-up time point. This is reflective overall that behavioral and economic changes do not happen simultaneously and that effects may change over time. The improvements for caregiver in self-efficacy and depression are promising, not only because they demonstrate improvements in emotional and behavioral wellness, but also because of their positive impacts on employment. The demonstrated improvements in self-efficacy past month nine for the full intervention suggests that an underlying claiming in securing and maintaining employment can exist addressed and that it may have positive impacts on employment. Cocky-efficacy is associated with greater motivation and chore satisfaction, self-leadership strategies and job performance, which are all necessary for success in the work force (Cherian and Jacob 2013). Length of time in the total intervention was associated with improvements in self-efficacy, though these results were only significant at the 90% confidence level. For the control group, self-efficacy reduced at month 9, and stayed lower than the other groups in the partial and full intervention, and results suggest that the longer someone participated in the peer back up group, the more than likely self-efficacy improved. The ability of the program to reduce depressive symptoms was about effective for the full intervention group by calendar month 15, suggesting that a shift in mental health takes a meaning amount of fourth dimension. Trauma-informed group therapy is known to have positive effects on behavioral health and parenting practices (Potato et al. 2015). The Network RCT'south weekly sessions had a significant clinical bear on suggesting profound wellness effects for non-medical, trauma-informed interventions. This is especially important because any type of reduced depression is known to take positive effects on helping individuals to secure and maintain employment (Schoenbaum et al. 2002). Both improved self-efficacy and reduced mental health are known to improve parenting practices, and therefore have an touch on on the wellbeing of children (Kohlhoff and Barnett 2013).
This two-generation effect is reflected in The Network RCT results. Though this study worked with the developed caregiver and not the whole family through our programming, based on other research, information technology is probable that these demonstrated improvements in caregiver self-efficacy, depression, and economic security are linked to improved parenting, and hence the protection of well-being amongst their young children (Schmit et al. 2014; Shonkoff and Fisher 2013; The Annie E. Casey Foundation 2014; Assistants for Children and Families Function of Family Help 2016). Evidence here is in child developmental risks. Caregivers in the intervention groups reported no changes in developmental risk concerns; however, the control grouping reported statistically significant increases in child developmental risks. Non merely do increased self-efficacy and improvement in low potentially buffer children from developmental risk, but increased risk in the command group is consequent with other studies that demonstrate that participation in regular TANF programming may be associated with poorer child evolution outcomes (Heflin and Acevedo 2011). Additionally, since the command group received no intervention to help mitigate depressive symptoms, this effect is consequent with reports that caregiver depression is linked with heightened risk of developmental problems in immature children, either through disrupted parenting practices, or in response to a child's developmental delay (E. Cheng et al. 2015; Rose-Jacobs et al. 2008). When controlling for the extent to which participants are exposed to the intervention, the greater the participation in the full intervention, the less likely i was to study developmental risks for their children. Overall, results demonstrate that incorporating trauma-informed peer back up into a TANF curriculum will likely accept positive benefits on caregiver depression, self-efficacy and on child wellbeing; yet, the timing and endurance of these changes beyond month ix and 15 is uncertain.
There is some research demonstrating that financial management skills are related to food insecurity and other forms of hardship (Gundersen and Garasky 2012), yet there has been no financial management intervention to engagement that shows effects on reducing food insecurity and other types of hardship with basic needs. With the Network RCT, hardship with food, housing, and energy between the groups were meaning. Statistically significant reductions in hardship were observed for the full intervention at month 12, but they were not observed in either the command or fractional intervention groups. This suggests that although financial empowerment training may provide opportunities to build capabilities to address economical arduousness and manage paying bills on time (or more consistently), the addition of trauma-informed intendance may assist participants ameliorate overall economical stability.
Labor market results were mixed. The command group saw greater increases in employment compared to the partial and full intervention groups. This is probable a result of standard TANF programming that has the singular focus on mandating that people find employment as quickly as possible. It is important to notation, however, that in that location were no significant differences in reported income between the total intervention grouping and the control group, while the partial intervention group earnings remained lower than both groups throughout. These results demonstrate that while employment may ameliorate, it may not substantially modify a caregiver's income. Indeed, the full intervention group showed a steady income increment over time, rather than income fluctuation that was reported in the command grouping. Finally, the amount of participation in the classes had fiddling to practise with income, but was associated with improvements in employment for the total intervention group.
The generalizability of our findings is express by our assay of TANF beneficiaries that reside in 1 metropolis. However, since the ways tests to make up one's mind TANF eligibility are like beyond states, TANF populations will have similar demographic compositions across the The states (Kim and Fording 2010). Secondly, class participation rates were limited (though no different than participation in standard TANF programming in the state) and potentially hindered our power to assess full treatment effects. Nevertheless, our sensitivity analysis suggests that even partial exposure to the full intervention has significant impacts on participants' behavioral and economic outcomes. Though at that place was noticeable survey attrition across time that may touch the precision of our estimates (Crosby et al. 2010), there were however no pregnant differences by group across time suggesting successful retention strategies and internal validity to our results (Brannon et al. 2013; Yancey et al. 2006). Finally, all information are self-reported, and therefore may be prone to bias, where people may minimize symptoms or other concerns and exaggerate income and employment experiences.
Overall, our results, while promising, suggest the need for a re-design of the intervention for full implementation beyond the inquiry phase. Promising areas are in the integration of financial empowerment education into the curriculum of the trauma-informed peer support. As well, compunction over fourth dimension, suggests that the curriculum should be shortened to demand less overall time of families that are already struggling to find fourth dimension for self-care then that participation in the class can be more than robust.
Results of the Network RCT suggest that trauma-informed approaches may create steady improvements in health and income. Future inquiry should explore how such approaches may assist participants improve income and wellbeing over a longer period of time for caregiver and child.
References
-
Adams, A. E., Bybee, D., Tolman, R. M., Sullivan, C. One thousand., & Kennedy, A. C. (2013). Does job stability mediate the human relationship between intimate partner violence and mental wellness amongst low-income women? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(iv), 600–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajop.12053.
-
Administration for Children and Families Office of Family Assistance. (2016). Information Memoranda TANFACF-IM-2016-03: Strengthening TANF Outcomes by Developing Two-Generation Approaches. Washington DC: U.S. Section of Health and Human Services. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ofa/tanf_acf_im_2016_03.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2016.
-
Anda, R. F., Brown, D. West., Dube, Southward. R., Bremner, J. D., Felitti, V. J., & Giles, West. H. (2008). Adverse childhood experiences and chronic obstructive pulmonary affliction in adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(5), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.002.
-
Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Bremner, J. D., Walker, J. D., Whitfield, C., Perry, B. D., et al. (2006). The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. European Athenaeum of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256(3), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-005-0624-4.
-
Baglivio, M. T., Epps, N., Swartz, Thousand., Sayedul Huq, K., Sheer, A., & Hardt, N. Southward. (2014). The Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) in the Lives of Juvenile Offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(two), 12–34.
-
Bethell, C. D., Newacheck, P., Hawes, E., & Halfon, N. (2014). Adverse babyhood experiences: Assessing the impact on wellness and schoolhouse engagement and the mitigating office of resilience. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2106–2115. https://doi.org/x.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914.
-
Bickel, G., Nord, M., Price, C., Hamilton, W., & Melt, J. (2000). Measuring food security in the The states: Guide to measuring household food security. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation.
-
Blossom, Southward. 50., & Sreedhar, South. Y. (2008). The sanctuary model of trauma-informed organizational change. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 17(3), 48–53.
-
Brannon, E. E., Kuhl, E. South., Boles, R. E., Aylward, B. S., Benoit Ratcliff, 1000., Valenzuela, J. Thou., et al. (2013). Strategies for recruitment and retentivity of families from low-income, indigenous minority backgrounds in a longitudinal study of caregiver feeding and child weight. Children'due south Health Intendance, 42(3), 198–213. https://doi.org/ten.1080/02739615.2013.816590.
-
Breiding, Chiliad. J., Smith, Due south. One thousand., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, Chiliad. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)-Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, 63(SS08), i–18.
-
Bryner, Grand., & Martin, R. (2005). Innovation in welfare policy: Evaluating state efforts to encourage piece of work among low-income families. Review of Policy Research, 22(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00139.10.
-
Cambron, C., Gringeri, C., & Vogel-Ferguson, Thou. B. (2014). Physical and mental health correlates of adverse childhood experiences amid low-income women. Health & Social Work, 39(4), 221–229.
-
Cambron, C., Gringeri, C., & Vogel-Ferguson, M. B. (2015). Adverse babyhood experiences, depression and mental health barriers to piece of work among low-income women. Social Piece of work in Public Health, 30(6), 504–515. https://doi.org/ten.1080/19371918.2015.1073645.
-
Carlson, Southward. J., Andrews, M. S., & Bickel, 1000. W. (1999). Measuring nutrient insecurity and hunger in the United States: Development of a national benchmark measure and prevalence estimates. Journal of Nutrition, 129(2S Suppl), 510S–516S.
-
Chase-Lansdale, P. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2014). Two-generation programs in the twenty-first century. The Future of Children, 24(1), 13–39.
-
Cheng, T. C. (2013). Intimate partner violence and welfare participation: A longitudinal causal analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(iv), 808–830.
-
Cheng, E., Palta, K., Poehlmann-Tynan, J., & Witt, West. P. (2015). The influence of children'southward cognitive delay and behavior bug on maternal depression. Journal of Pediatrics, 167(3), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.003.
-
Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of self efficacy on motivation and functioning of employees. International Periodical of Business concern and Direction, 8(14), eighty–88.
-
Chilton, M., Knowles, Yard., Rabinowich, J., & Arnold, K. T. (2015). The relationship between childhood arduousness and food insecurity: 'It's like a bird nesting in your head'. Public Health Diet, ane–11. https://doi.org/ten.1017/S1368980014003036.
-
Corcoran, M., Danziger, S. K., & Tolman, R. (2004). Long term employment of African-American and white welfare recipients and the role of persistent health and mental health issues. Women Health, 39(four), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v39n04_02.
-
Crosby, R. A., Salazar, L. F., DiClemente, R. J., & Lang, D. L. (2010). Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-attain populations. Health Education Research, 25(i), 1–v. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyp062.
-
Cutts, D. B., Meyers, A. F., Black, M. G., Casey, P. H., Chilton, 1000., Cook, J. T., et al. (2011). The states Housing insecurity and the wellness of very young children. [Enquiry Back up, Non-U.S. Gov't]. American Journal of Public Health, 101(8), 1508–1514. https://doi.org/ten.2105/AJPH.2011.300139.
-
Danese, A., Moffitt, T. E., Harrington, H., Milne, B. J., Polanczyk, G., Pariante, C. M., et al. (2009). Adverse babyhood experiences and developed risk factors for age-related disease: Depression, inflammation, and clustering of metabolic chance markers. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163(12), 1135–1143.
-
Danziger, South. K. (2010). The pass up of cash welfare and implications for social policy and poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 523–545.
-
Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2001). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twentyfirst century: Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
-
Dube, Southward. R., Fairweather, D., Pearson, W. Southward., Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., & Croft, J. B. (2009). Cumulative childhood stress and autoimmune diseases in adults. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71(two), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1097/Psy.0b013e3181907888.
-
Dworsky, A., & Courtney, M. Due east. (2007). Barriers to employment among TANF applicants and their consequences for self-sufficiency. Families in Club-the Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3647.
-
Evans, Chiliad. West., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebnov, P. K. (2011). Stressing out the poor: chronic physiological stress and the income-achievement gap. Customs Investments, 23(2), 22–27.
-
Falk, G. (2012). Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF): Welfare-to-work revisited CRS Study for Congress (Vol. R42768). Washington, DC: Congressional Inquiry Service.
-
Felitti, V., Anda, R. F., Dale, N., David, F. Westward., Alison, M. S., Valerie, E., et al. (1998). Human relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Babyhood Experiences (ACE) written report. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(iv), 245–258.
-
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, One thousand. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: Academy of S Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
-
Frank, D. A., Casey, P. H., Black, Chiliad. M., Rose-Jacobs, R., Chilton, Grand., Cutts, D., et al. (2010). Cumulative hardship and wellness of low-income, immature children: Multisite surveillance report. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Pediatrics, 125(5), e1115–e1123. https://doi.org/ten.1542/peds.2009-1078.
-
Gardiner, J. C., Luo, Z., & Roman, L. A. (2009). Stock-still effects, random effects and GEE: What are the differences? Statistics in Medicine, 28(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/x.1002/sim.3478.
-
Glascoe, F. (1998a). Collaborating with parents: Using parents' evaluation of developmental condition to discover and accost developmental and behavioral bug. Nashville, TN: Ellsworth and Vandermeer Press, Ltd.
-
Glascoe, F. (1998b). Scoring, administration and estimation guidelines collaborating with parents: Using parents' evaluation of developmental status to notice and address developmental and behavioral problems. Nashville, TN, US: Ellsworth & Vandermeer Press, pp. 9–30.
-
Glascoe, F. (1998c). Collaborating with Parents: Using Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status to Notice and Address Developmental and Behavioral Problems. Nashville, TN: Ellsworth & Vandermeer Press Ltd.
-
Glascoe, F. (2003). Parents' evaluation of developmental status: how well do parents' concerns identify children with behavioral and emotional problems? Clinical Pediatrics, 42(two), 133–138.
-
Glascoe, F., & Marks, M. (2011). Detecting children with developmental-behavioral issues: The value of collaborating with parents. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(two), 258–279.
-
Gueron, J. M., & Rolston, H. (2013). Fighting for reliable evidence. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Gundersen, C. G., & Garasky, Due south. B. (2012). Financial management skills are associated with food insecurity in a sample of households with children in the United states. Jounral of Nutrition, 142(10), 1865–1870. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.162214.
-
Hann, D., Winter, Chiliad., & Jacobsen, P. (1999). Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: Evaluation of the Heart for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Periodical of Psychosomatic Research, 46(5), 437–443.
-
Heflin, C. Chiliad., & Acevedo, S. Grand. (2011). Non-income furnishings of welfare receipt on early on childhood cognitive scores. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(v), 634–643. https://doi.org/x.1016/j.childyouth.2010.xi.006.
-
Hildebrandt, Due east., & Kelber, S. T. (2012). TANF over time: The tale of three studies. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 13(3), 130–141. https://doi.org/x.1177/1527154412456433.
-
Hildebrandt, E., & Stevens, P. (2009). Impoverished women with children and no welfare benefits: The urgency of researching failures of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. American Journal of Public Health, 99(5), 793–801.
-
Ibrahim, J. Thousand., Chen, M.-H., Lipsitz, S. R., & Herring, A. H. (2005). Missing-information methods for generalized linear models: A comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 332–346.
-
Kaplan, G. A., Siefert, K., Ranjit, Due north., Raghunathan, T. E., Young, East. A., Tran, D., et al. (2005). The health of poor women under welfare reform. American Journal of Public Wellness, 95(7), 1252–1258.
-
Kennedy, A. C. (2006). Urban adolescent mothers exposed to community, family, and partner violence: Prevalence, outcomes, and welfare policy implications. [Review]. The American Journal of orthopsychiatry, 76(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/x.1037/0002-9432.76.1.44.
-
Kim, B., & Fording, R. C. (2010). Second-Order devolution and the implementation of TANF in the US States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, ten(4), 341–367.
-
Kneipp, Due south., Kairalla, J., Lutz, B., Pereira, D., Hall, A., Flocks, J., et al. (2011). Public health nursing instance management for women receiving temporary assistance for needy families: A randomized controlled trial using community-based participatory research. American Journal of Public Wellness, 101(9), 1759–1768. https://doi.org/x.2105/AJPH.2011.300210.
-
Kneipp, Southward., Kairalla, J., & Sheely, A. (2013). A randomized controlled trial to improve health among women receiving welfare in the U.Due south.: The relationship between employment outcomes and the economic recession. Social Science & Medicine, 80, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.011.
-
Kohlhoff, J., & Barnett, B. (2013). Parenting self-efficacy: Links with maternal low, infant behaviour and adult attachment. Early on Human Development, 89(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.01.008.
-
Kohout, F. J., Berkman, Fifty. F., Evans, D. A., & Cornoni-Huntley, J. (1993). Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. Periodical of Aging and Health, v(2), 179–193.
-
Larkin, H., Felitti, Five. J., & Anda, R. F. (2014). Social piece of work and adverse childhood experiences research: Implications for do and health policy. Social Work in Public Wellness, 29(one), one–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2011.619433.
-
Liu, Y., Croft, J. B., Chapman, D. P., Perry, G. S., Greenlund, Thou. J., Zhao, One thousand., et al. (2013). Relationship between agin childhood experiences and unemployment among adults from five U.S. states. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0554-1.
-
Lown, Eastward. A., Schmidt, 50. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). Interpersonal violence among women seeking welfare: Unraveling lives. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. American Journal of Public Health, 96(8), 1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.057786.
-
Lu, W., Mueser, Chiliad. T., Rosenberg, Southward. D., & Jankowski, M. K. (2008). Correlates of adverse childhood experiences among adults with severe mood disorders. Psychiatric Services, 59(9), 1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.59.9.1018.
-
Martin, K. C., & Caminada, K. (2011). Welfare reform in the U.S.: A policy overview assay. Poverty & Public Policy, 3(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/ten.2202/1944-2858.1087.
-
Murphy, A., Steele, H., Bate, J., Nikitiades, A., Allman, B., Bonuck, K., et al. (2015). Group zipper-based intervention: Trauma-informed care for families with adverse childhood experiences. Family unit & Community Health, 38(iii), 268–279. https://doi.org/ten.1097/FCH.0000000000000074.
-
Office of Family unit Help PeerTA Network. (2015). Breaking the Poverty Bicycle and Opening Doors to Opportunity for TANF Families: Developing a Two-Generation Arroyo. [Webinar Transcript].
-
Peterson, R., & Krivo, L. (2005). Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and fierce criminal offense: recent lessons and new directions for enquiry. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 331–356.
-
Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the full general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, i, 385–401.
-
Randles, J. One thousand. (2014). Partnering and parenting in poverty: A qualitative analysis of a relationship skills program for low‐income, unmarried families. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(ii), 385–412.
-
Rose-Jacobs, R., Black, 1000. Grand., Casey, P. H., Melt, J. T., Cutts, D. B., Chilton, Grand., et al. (2008). Household nutrient insecurity: Associations with at-risk infant and toddler evolution. Pediatrics, 121(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3717.
-
Schmit, S., Matthews, H., & Gilded, O. (2014). Thriving children, successful parents: A two-generation approach to policy. Washington, DC: CLASP.
-
Schoenbaum, M., Unützer, J., McCaffrey, D., Duan, North., Sherbourne, C., & Wells, K. B. (2002). The effects of primary intendance depression treatment on patients' clinical status and employment. Wellness Services Research, 37(v), 1145–1158.
-
Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, xviii(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242.
-
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy calibration. In J. Weinman, S. Wright & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 33–37). Windsor, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland: NFER-NELSON.
-
Shonkoff, J., & Fisher, P. (2013). Rethinking prove-based practice and 2-generation programs to create the future of early childhood policy. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4pt2), 1635–1653.
-
Staggs, Due south. L., Long, Due south. K., Mason, G. E., Krishnan, S., & Riger, Southward. (2007). Intimate partner violence, social back up, and employment in the post-welfare reform era. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(three), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295388.
-
Staub, Due east., & Vollhardt, J. (2008). Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping subsequently victimization and other trauma. American Periodical of Orthopsychiatry, 78(3), 267–280.
-
Sun, J., Patel, F., Kirzner, R., Newton-Famous, Due north., Owens, C., Welles, Southward. 50., et al. (2016). The Edifice Wealth and Wellness Network: Methods and baseline characteristics from a randomized controlled trial for families with young children participating in temporary assistance for needy families (TANF). BMC Public Wellness, 16, 583. https://doi.org/ten.1186/s12889-016-3233-4.
-
The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2014). Creating Opportunities for Families: A Two-generation Arroyo. [written report].
-
Vayshenker, B., Mulay, A. L., Gonzales, Fifty., West, G. L., Chocolate-brown, I., & Yanos, P. T. (2016). Participation in peer support services and outcomes related to recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Periodical, 39(3), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000178.
-
Western, B., Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Sirois, C. (2016). Written report retention as bias reduction in a hard-to-reach population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(20), 5477–5485. https://doi.org/ten.1073/pnas.1604138113.
-
Yancey, A. Thou., Ortega, A. N., & Kumanyika, S. 1000. (2006). Effective recruitment and retentivity of minority research participants. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/x.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102113.
-
Zhang, W., O'Brien, N., Forrest, J., Salters, Thou., Patterson, T., & Montaner, J. et al. (2012). Validating a shortened depression scale (10 item CES-D) among HIV-positive people in British Columbia, Canada. PLoS One, seven(7), e40793.
-
Ziliak, J. P. (2014). Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. In R. Moffit (Ed.), National Agency of Economical Inquiry Conference Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the U.s.: Volume Ii: December five-6, 2014 Boston, MA: Center for Poverty Research, Academy of Kentucky. http://www.nber.org/papers/w21038.
Writer Contributions
50.G.B. analyzed the data and wrote the results, J.D. assisted with the information assay and edited the paper, F.P. assisted with study pattern, implementing the program, data drove, and edited the newspaper, S.B. assisted with study design and editing the paper, G.C. designed and implemented the written report and wrote the paper.
Author data
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Upstanding Approval
All procedures in this study were approved by the Drexel University Institutional Review Lath.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in this study.
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Artistic Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/past/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you lot give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Reprints and Permissions
Nigh this article
Cite this commodity
Booshehri, 50.G., Dugan, J., Patel, F. et al. Trauma-informed Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): A Randomized Controlled Trial with a 2-Generation Bear on. J Kid Fam Stud 27, 1594–1604 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0987-y
-
Published:
-
Issue Engagement:
-
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0987-y
Keywords
- TANF
- Randomized controlled trial
- Two-generation
- Depression
- Trauma
Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10826-017-0987-y
0 Response to "How the Media Frame Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Tanf"
Publicar un comentario